Maha Mrityunjaya Mantra - महा मृत्युंजय मंत्र


It's mentioned in  Padampuran "पदम् पुराण" that Mahamrituanjaya mantra is composed in hymn form by Maharishi Markanday.

In the Rig-Veda, 4/52/12 the mantra has been recorded as:

ॐ त्र्यम्बकं यजामहे सुगन्धिं पुष्टिवर्धनम् उर्वारुकमिव बन्धनान् मृत्योर्मुक्षीय मामृतात् ॥

Om Tryambakam Yajaamahe
Sugandhim Pussttivardhanam
Urvaarukamiva Bandhanaan
Mrtyormukssiiya Maamrtaat ||




This mantra dedicated to lord Shiva as Mrityunjaya is found in the Rig Veda.  It is called the Maha Mrityunjaya mantra, the Great Death-Conquering mantra. It is a mantra that has many names and forms. It is called the Rudra mantra, referring to the furious aspect of Shiva; the Tryambakam mantra, alluding to Shiva's three eyes; and its is sometimes known as the Mrita-Sanjivini mantra because it is a component of the "life-restoring" practice given to the primordial sage Shukra after he had completed an exhausting period of austerity, but Amrit Sanjivani mantra is different from maha Mrityunjaya mantra, it is a combination of mrityunjaya and gayatri.

The Maha Mrityunjaya mantra is hailed by the sages as the heart of the Veda. Along with the Gayatri mantra it holds the highest place among the many mantras used for contemplation and meditation.


ॐ aum         = is a sacred/mystical syllable in Sanatan Dharma or Indian religions, i.e. Hinduism, Jainism, and Buddhism
tryambakam =  the three-eyed one (accusative case)
yajamahe      = We worship, adore, honor, revere
sugandhim     = sweet smelling, fragrant (accusative case)
pushti            = A well-nourished condition, thriving, prosperous, fullness of life
vardhanam    = One who nourishes, strengthens, causes to increase (in health, wealth, well-being); who  
                        gladdens, exhilarates, and restores health; a good gardener
urvarukam    =  'urva' means "vishal" or big and powerful or deadly. 'arukam' means 'disease'. Thus
                         urvarukam means deadly and overpowering diseases.
iva               = like, just as
bandhanān   = "from captivity" {i.e. from the stem of the cucumber} (of the gourd); (the ending is actually
                        long a then -d which changes to n/anusvara because of sandhi)
                        bandhanān means bound down. Thus read with urvārukam iva, it means 'I am bound down 
                        just as by deadly and overpowering diseases'.
mrityor         = From death
mukshīya      = Free, liberate
ma                = me
amritat           = [with] immortality, emancipation

108 names of Goddess Durga


Maa Durga is the personification of the divine force of the super power. The Durga means ‘the invincible’, so the Durga is regarded as the ever victorious warrior of the Gods lineage. Durga is the representation of courage, strength, ethics and protection. She is the destroyer of sin and evil and the savior of morality and ethics. Goddess Durga is a form of Divine Power, the Shakti. Durga is the confluence of the power, beauty and intelligence of Maha lakshmi, Maha Saraswati and Maha Kali. So, Durga is regarded as ‘the ultimate deity’. Regarded as the savior of needy and the destroyer of destructors, she is the mother of the entire universe as well as the slayer of evils. She is known by 108 different names according to quality she possesses. It is believed that Maa Durga gets pleased if, these names (Durga Shatnam Strotam) are chanted with devotion. Read on to know the 108 names of the Goddess along with their meaning.

Meaning Of 108 Durga Names 

Sati - One who got burned alive
Saadhvi - The Sanguine
Bhavaprita - One who is loved by the universe
Bhavaani - The abode of the universe
Bhavamochani - The absolver of the universe
Aarya - Goddess
Durga - The Invincible
Jaya - The Victorious
Aadya - The Initial reality
Trinetra - One who has three-eyes
Shooldharini - One who holds a monodent
Pinaakadharini - One who holds the trident of Shiva
Chitra - The Picturesque
Chandaghanta - One who has mighty bells
Mahatapa - With severe penance
Manah - Mind
Buddhi - Intelligence
Ahankaara - One with Pride
Chittarupa - One who is in thought-state
Chita - Death-bed
Chiti - The thinking mind
Sarvamantramayi - One who possess all the instruments of thought
Satta - One who is above all
Satyanandasvarupini - Form of Eternal bliss
Ananta - One who is Infinite or beyond measure
Bhaavini - The Beautiful Woman
Bhaavya - Represents Future
Bhavya - With Magnificence
Abhavya - Improper or fear-causing
Sadagati - Always in motion, bestowing Moksha (salvation)
Shaambhavi - Consort of Shambhu
Devamata - Mother Goddess
Chinta - Tension
Ratnapriya - Adorned or loved by jewels
Sarvavidya - Knowledgeable
Dakshakanya - Daughter of Daksha
Dakshayajñavinaashini - Interrupter of the sacrifice of Daksha
Aparna - One who doesnt eat even leaves while fasting
Anekavarna - One who has many complexions
Paatala - Red in color
Paatalavati - Wearing red-color attire
Pattaambaraparidhaana - Wearing a dress made of leather
Kalamanjiiraranjini - Wearing a musical anklet
Ameyaa - One who is beyond measure
Vikrama - Violent
Krrooraa - Brutal (on demons)
Sundari - The Gorgeous
Sursundari - Extremely Beautiful
Vandurga - Goddess of forests
Maatangi - Goddess of Matanga
Matangamunipujita - Worshipped by Sage Matanga
Braahmi - Power of God Brahma
Maaheshvari - Power of Lord Mahesha (Shiva)
Aeindri - Power of God Indra
Kaumaari - The adolescent
Vaishnavi - The invincible
Chaamunda - Slayer of Chanda and Munda(demons)
Vaarahi - One who rides on Varaah
Lakshmi - Goddess of Wealth
Purushaakriti - One who takes the form of a man
Vimalauttkarshini - One who provides joy
Gyaana - Full of Knowledge
Kriya - Nitya- The eternal one
Buddhida - The bestower of wisdom
Bahula - One who is in various forms
Bahulaprema - One who is loved by all
Sarvavahanavahana - One who rides all vehicles
NishumbhaShumbhaHanani - Slayer of the demon-brothers Shumbha Nishumbha
MahishasuraMardini - Slayer of the bull-demon Mahishaasura
MadhuKaitabhaHantri - Slayer of the demon-duo Madhu and Kaitabha
ChandaMundaVinashini - Destroyer of the ferocious asuras Chanda and Munda
Sarvasuravinasha - Destroyer of all demons
Sarvadaanavaghaatini - Possessing the power to kill all the demons
Sarvashaastramayi - One who is deft in all theories
Satya - The truth
Sarvaastradhaarini - Possessor of all the missile weapons
Anekashastrahasta - Possessor of many hand weapons
AnekastraDhaarini - Possessor of many missile weapons
Komaari - The beautiful adolescent
Ekakanya - The girl child
Kaishori - The adolescent
Yuvati - The Woman
Yati - Ascetic, one who renounces the world
Apraudha - One who never gets old
Praudha - One who is old
Vriddhamaata - The old mother (loosely)
Balaprada - The bestower of strength
Mahodari - One who has huge belly which stores the universe
Muktakesha - One who has open tresses
Ghorarupa - Having a fierce outlook
Mahaabala - Having immense strength
Agnijwaala - One who is poignant like fire
Raudramukhi - One who has a fierce face like destroyer Rudra
Kaalaratri - Goddess who is black like night
Tapasvini - one who is engaged in penance
Narayani - The destructive aspect of Lord Narayana (Brahma)
Bhadrakaali - Fierce form of Kali
Vishnumaya - Spell of Lord Vishnu
Jalodari - Abode of the ethereal universe
Shivadooti - Ambassador of Lord Shiva
Karaali - The Violent
Ananta - The Infinite
Parameshvari - The Ultimate Goddess
Katyayani - One who is worshipped by sage Katyanan
Savitri - Daughter of the Sun God Savitr
Pratyaksha - One who is real
Brahmavaadini - One who is present everywhere

Reverence for life – The Krishna way



The respect for life was elaborated by the German philosopher Albert Schweitzer wherein he remarked in criticism on the Indian religion. He said that the religion of this country is life negative. This remark is correct to a large extent, if Krishna is left out. But it is utterly wrong in the context of Krishna. If Schweitzer had tried to understand Krishna he would never have said so.



When we will see to Lord Buddha or Lord Mahavir or Jesus we will feel a sadness or nothingness in them. Buddha and Mahavira renounce happiness, Krishna does not renounce it. Krishna accepts that which is. He does not find happiness even worth renouncing, let alone indulging. He does not find happiness even worth renouncing. He has no desire whatsoever to make even a slight change in life as it is; he accepts it totally.

But it was unfortunate that we did not allow Krishna to inuence our life in a broad way. He remains a lonely dancing island in the vast ocean of sorrow and misery that is our life. Or, we can say he is a small oasis of joyous dancing and celebration in the huge desert of sadness and negativity, of suppression and condemnation that we really are. Krishna could not inuence the whole spectrum of our life, and for this we are alone to blame. Krishna is not in the least responsible for it. We were not that worthy, that deserving, to have him, to imbibe him, to absorb him.

Up to now, man’s mind has thought of and looked at life in fragments – and thought dialectically.The religious man denies the body and accepts the soul. And what is worse, he creates a conict, a dichotomy between the body and spirit. He denies this world, he accepts the other world, and thus creates a state of hostility between the two. Naturally our life is going to be sad and miserable if we deny the body, because all our life’s juice – its health and vitality, its sensitivities and beauty, all its music – has its source in the body. So a religion that denies and denounces the body is bound to be anemic and ill, it has to be lackluster. Such a religion is going to be as pale and lifeless as a dry leaf fallen from a tree. And the people who follow such a religion, who allow themselves to be inuenced and conditioned by it, will be as anemic and prone to death as these leaves are.

Krishna is utterly incomparable, he is so unique. Firstly, his uniqueness lies in the fact that although Krishna happened in the ancient past he belongs to the future, is really of the future. Man has yet to grow to that height where he can be a contemporary of Krishna’s. He is still beyond man’s understanding; he continues to puzzle and battle us. Only in some future time will we be able to understand him and appreciate his virtues. And there are good reasons for it.

The most important reason is that Krishna is the only one in our whole history who reached the absolute height and depth of religion, and yet he is not at all serious and sad, not in tears. By and large, the chief characteristic of a religious person has been that he is somber, serious and sad-looking – like one vanquished in the battle of life, like a renegade from life. In the long line of such sages it is Krishna alone who comes dancing, singing and laughing.

Religions of the past were all life-denying and masochistic, extolling sorrow and suffering as great virtues. If you set aside Krishna’s vision of religion, then every religion of the past presented a sad and sorrowful face. A laughing religion, a religion that accepts life in its totality is yet to be born. And it is good that the old religions are dead, along with them, that the old God, the God of our old concepts is dead too.

What does Krishna really tell Arjuna? When he says, "Leave everything and come to me," he means to say that Arjuna should set aside everything and go to the feet of life itself, should accept life as it is.

A fakir has said in his prayer, "O Lord, I accept you, but not your world." In fact, every fakir says, "O Lord, I accept you, but not your world." This is opposite to the position taken by an atheist. The atheist says, "I accept your world, not you." Thus theists and atheists are two sides of the same coin.

Krishna's theism is quite unique. In fact, only Krishna is a theist: he accepts what is. He says to God, "I accept you and your world too," and this acceptance is so complete, so profound that it is difficult to know where the world ends and God begins. The world is really the extended hand of God, and God is the innermost being hidden in the world. The difference between the world and God is no more than this.

Krishna accepts the whole. It is important to understand that Krishna does not give up anything, neither pain nor happiness. He does not renounce that which is. With him the question of renunciation does not arise.

If we understand rightly we will see that the individual, the ego, the I begins with giving up, with renunciation. As soon as we renounce something I-ness into being. There is no way for me, for the ego to be if we don't give up anything...........


Gotra System..गोत्र क्या है

Why should only Sons carry the Gotra of their father, why can’t daughters? How does the Gotra of a daughter change just because she marries a person belonging to a different Gotra? What is the necessity of maintaining only the man’s ancestry, why not maintain that of women too? This was the question that was puzzling me about this Gotra system till recently, until I found out the scientific reasoning behind the Gotra system by chance while studying a puzzle in modern Genetics for which the biologists are trying to find an answer!



The Hindu Gotra System – Male Lineage Identification

The Gotra is a system which associates a person with his most ancient or root ancestor in an unbroken male lineage. For instance if a person says that he belongs to the Bharadwaja Gotra then it means that he traces back his male ancestry to the ancient Rishi (Saint or Seer) Bharadwaja. So Gotra refers to the Root Person in a person’s male lineage.
The Gotra system is practiced amongst most Hindus. See here for a List of Hindu Gotras practiced by different sections of the Hindu Society
Brahmins identify their male lineage by considering themselves to be the descendants of the 8 great Rishis ie Saptarshis (The Seven Sacred Saints) + Bharadwaja Rishi. So the list of root Brahmin Gotras is as follows
  • Angirasa
  • Atri
  • Gautam
  • Kashyapa
  • Bhrigu
  • Vasistha
  • Kutsa
  • Bharadwaja
These 8 Rishis are called Gotrakarin meaning roots of Gotras. All other Brahmin Gotras evolved from one of the above Gotras. What this means is that the descendants of these Rishis over time started their own Gotras. The total number of established Gotras today is 49. However each of them finally trace back to one of the root Gotrakarin Rishi.
The word Gotra is formed from the two Sanskrit words Gau (meaning Cow) and Trahi (meaning Shed).
Note that the English word Cow is a derived word of the Sanskrit word Gau with the same meaning Gau.
So Gotra means Cowshed, where in the context is that Gotra is like the Cowshed protecting a particular male lineage. Cows are extremely important sacred animals to Hindus and there were a large number of best breeds of Cows that ancient Hindus reared and worshipped, and hence the name Gotra referring to the system of maintaining individual male lineages seems more appropriate.

A Girl and a Boy belonging to the same Gotra cannot marry!

This is the most important and the only rule in the Gotra system is I may say so. Yes, a Bride and a Bridegroom belonging to the same Gotra are considered to be siblings and hence it is prohibited for them to marry even if they belong to distant families. The reason given was since they belonged to the same ancestor, it will be like a brother marrying a sister which is known to cause genetic disorders in their offspring.
As I can see now, probably the prevention of marriages within the same Gotra was the only reason for the Gotra system to be created.
But again I used to think, what a crap, how can a boy and a girl belonging to two different families who haven’t met for centuries be considered as siblings?
Only until I was able to correlate a puzzle in modern Genetics to the Gotra system.
And now to the Science behind the Gotra System, but before that let us just check out one more additional rule related to marriages in the Gotra System.

Pravaras and the Gotras

Pravara is a list of most excellent Rishis in a Gotra lineage. As we saw earlier, some of the descendants of the most ancient Gotras started their own Gotras, however they maintained a list of Pravaras while doing so and attached the list of their most excellent Ancestors with this derived Gotras.
For instance the Vatsa Gotra has BhargavaChyavanaJamadagnya , Apnavana as their Pravaras. What this means is that Vatsa Gotra has in its lineage all these Gotras and traces back its root to Bhrigu Rishi in the list of Gotrakarins.
The idea behind this Pravara system is probably to ensure that the derived Gotras still maintain track of their root Gotras, and this in turn is used to ensure that Bride and Bridegroom from no two derived Gotras coming from the same root Gotra marry each other. Every Gotra which is a derived Gotra maintains a list of Pravaras attached to it.
This is because, the essence of the Gotra system is finally to prevent marriages within the same Gotra. Now consider two derived Gotras which came from the same Gotra, then it might happen that over time people might forget that both these Gotras came from the same root Gotra, and may allow marriages within these Gotras since their names are different! To prevent this, the derived Gotras maintained a list of Pravaras (which were the prominent junctions where the derived Gotras got created), and the additional rule in the Gotra system is that, even if the Bride and Bridegroom belong to different Gotras, they still cannot get married even if just one of their Gotra Pravara matches.
This makes sense as this prevents marriages between derived Gotras which belong to the same root Gotra. This reminds me of a similar logic in the modern Object Oriented Programming in Software Systems.
Derived Classes
Consider a Class B which is derived from Class A, and another Class C which is also derived from Class B. Now Consider another Class D which is derived from both Class B and Class C (multiple inheritance like in C++). If we look at the immediate ancestry of Class D, then it appears that Class B and Class Care the parents of Class D. But if you look at the ancestors of Class B and Class C, then they are the Children of Class A. Now if we replace the classes A, B and C with Gotras, then we can see that even if two Gotras B and C are different Gotras, if they share the same parent Gotra A (enlisted in the form of Pravaras), then they will become siblings, and hence the marriage between two different Gotras sharing the same Pravara is not allowed.
But again the question remained – what is the basis to prevent marriages within the same Gotras even after thousands of years later the roots separated? How can hundreds of generations later they can still be considered to be the children of same parents just because they belong to same Gotra (male lineage) or to different Gotras sharing the same Pravara (again the male lineage)?
Now to the Science behind the Gotra System, but before that let us refresh a bit of our knowledge about Genetics.
-Chromosomes and Genes
Humans have 23 pairs of Chromosomes and in each pair one Chromosome comes from the father and the other comes from the mother. So in all we have 46 Chromosomes in every cell, of which 23 come from the mother and 23 from the father.
Of these 23 pairs, there is one pair called the Sex Chromosomes which decide the gender of the person. During conception, if the resultant cell has XX sex chromosomes then the child will be a girl and if it is XY then the child will be a boy. X chromosome decides the female attributes of a person and Y Chromosome decides the male attributes of a person.
When the initial embryonic cell has XY chromosome, the female attributes get suppressed by the genes in the Y Chromosome and the embryo develops into a male child. Since only men have Y Chromosomes, son always gets his Y Chromosome from his father and the X Chromosome from his mother. On the other hand daughters always get their X Chromosomes, one each from both father and mother.
So the Y Chromosome is always preserved throughout a male lineage (Father – Son  -  Grandson etc) because a Son always gets it from his father, while the X Chromosome is not preserved in the female lineage (Mother, Daughter, Grand Daughter etc) because it comes from both father and mother.
A mother will pass either her mother’s X Chromosome to her Children or her father’s X Chromosome to her children or a combination of both because of both her X Chromosomes getting mixed (called as Crossover). On the other hand, a Son always gets his father’s Y Chromosome and that too almost intact without any changes because there is no corresponding another Y chromosome in his cells to do any mixing as his combination is XY, while that of females is XX which hence allows for mixing as both are X Chromosomes.

-Y Chromosome and Vedic Gotra System

By now you might have got a clue about the relation between Y Chromosome and the Hindu Vedic Gotra System 
Y Chromosome is the only Chromosome which gets passed down only between the men in a lineage. Women never get this Y Chromosome in their body. And hence Y Chromosome plays a crucial role in modern genetics in identifying the Genealogy ie male ancestry of a person. And the Gotra system was designed to track down the root Y Chromosome of a person quite easily. If a person belongs to Angirasa Gotra then it means that his Y Chromosome came all the way down over thousands of years of timespan from the Rishi Angirasa! And if a person belongs to a Gotra (say Bharadwaja) with Pravaras (Angirasa, Bhaarhaspatya, Bharadwaja), then it means that the person’s Y Chromosome came all the way down from Angirasa to Bhaarhaspatya to Bharadwaja to the person.
This also makes it clear why females are said to belong to the Gotra of their husbands after marriage. That is because women do not carry Y Chromosome, and their Sons will carry the Y Chromosome of the Father and hence the Gotra of a woman is said to be that of her husband after marriage. Pretty neat isn’t it?
All iz well so far, we now know the science behind the Gotra System. The ancient vedic Rishis hence very well knew the existence of the Y Chromosome and the paternal genetic material that was passed almost intact from father to Son, and hence created the Gotra system to identify their male lineages.Lord Buddha for instance belonged to Gautama Gotra which means that Buddha was a direct descendant of Rishi Gautama.
But then what is the reason to prevent marriages between individuals belonging to the same Gotra? 
Before that lets let's understand a bit more about the Y Chromosome.

Weakness of Y Chromosome

The Y Chromosome is the only Chromosome which does not have a similar pair in the human body. The pair of the Y Chromosome in humans is X Chromosome which is significantly different from Y Chromosome. Even the size of the Y Chromosome is just about one third the size of the X Chromosome. In other words throughout evolution the size of the Y Chromosome has been decreasing and it has lost most of its genes and has been reduced to its current size. Scientists are debating whether Y Chromosome will be able to survive for more than a few million years into the future or whether it will gradually vanish, and if it does so whether it will cause males to become extinct! Obviously because Y Chromosome is the one which makes a person male or a man. And if it becomes extinct, Biologists are not sure whether any other Chromosome in our body will be able to completely take over its functionality or not.
And the reason for all this is that unlike other Chromosomes, there is no way for Y Chromosome to repair itself by doing cross over with its Chromosomal pair. All other Chromosomes come in similar pairs and when there the DNA of one Chromosome gets damaged the cell can repair it by copying over the DNA from the other Chromosome in that pair as both the Chromosomes in all other pairs are almost identical in nature. This copying (or crossing over as it is called) also allows different combinations of mix and matches to happen between the genes of mother and father and allows the best of the matches to survive and hence make the Chromosomes stronger as they evolve in successive generations. Even X Chromosomes in female undergo this mix and match since there are two X Chromosomes in women.
However Y Chromosomes do not have any corresponding equivalent Chromosome in its pair. It can exist only in a XY Combination and X cannot mix and match with Y except for a small 5% of X which matches with Y, while the remaining 95% of Y Chromosome which is crucial in the development of a male have absolutely no match at all!. It is this 95% of the Y Chromosome which is completely responsible in humans for creating a male or a man.
But at the same time, Y Chromosome has to depend on itself to repair any of its injuries and for that it has created duplicate copies of its genes within itself. However this does not stop DNA damages in Y Chromosome which escape its local repair process from being propagated into the offspring males. This causes Y Chromosomes to accumulate more and more defects over a prolonged period of evolution and scientists believe that this is what is causing the Y Chromosome to keep losing its weight continuously.
As discussed earlier other Chromosomes do not face this issue because they have corresponding pairs from both the parents and the DNA damage could be easily corrected most of the time by the mix and match process that takes place between the two Chromosomes in a pair. This Chromosomal crossover process eliminates damaged genes and is one of the key processes in evolution of life.
So to summarize, Y Chromosome which is crucial for the creation and evolution of males has a fundamental weakness which is denying it participation in the normal process of evolution via Chromosomal mix and match to create better versions in every successive generation, and this weakness MAY lead to the extinction of Y Chromosome altogether over the next few million years, and if that happens scientists are not sure whether that would cause males to become extinct or not. And that is because Scientists are not sure whether any other Chromosome in the 23 pairs will be able to take over the role of the Y Chromosome or not. Is there is an specific end date for Y Chromosome sometime in the future?
On the other hand, it is not necessary that humanity will not be able to survive if males become extinct. Note that females do not need the Y Chromosome, and since all females have X Chromosomes, it would be still possible to create a mechanism where X Chromosomes from different females are used to create offspring, say like injecting the nuclei from the egg of one female into the egg of another female to fertilize it and that would grow into a girl child. So yes, that would be a humanity where only females exist.
Now I understand why Hinduism and its Vedic core regard Mother Goddess or female divinity to be more powerful than all male divinity put together 

Gotra System – Attempt to protect  Y Chromosome from becoming extinct ?

The Vedic Rishis had observed the degeneration of the Y Chromosome and they wanted to maintain as many individual healthy unique Y Chromosome lineages as possible. That would give a fair chance for males to continue to exist because Y Chromosomes get passed on over generations with almost negligible change in their genetic combinations, as they do not take part in mix and match with other Chromosome.
So if the Rishis could devise a mechanism where in a given Y Chromosome had very little chance of adding more genetic defects in it, then they could probably succeed in either slowing down further degeneration of the Y Chromosome or even probably completely stop any further degeneration of the Y Chromosome.
And the only way to stop that was to ensure that the 5% of the Y Chromosome which can be mixed and crossed over with its X counterpart be protected so that the remaining 95% which does not take part in the mix and match process (which self heals by having duplicate copies of its genes) stays healthy.
Now we know even in modern Genetics that marriages between cousins will increase the risk of causing genetic disorders. That is because, say suppose there is a recessive dangerous gene in one person. What this means is that say a person is carrying a dangerous abnormality causing gene in one of his chromosome, but whose effect has been hidden in that person (or is not being expressed) because the corresponding gene in the pairing Chromosome is stronger and hence is preventing this abnormality causing gene from activating.
Now there are fair chances that his offsprings will be carriers of these genes throughout successive generations. As long as they keep marrying outside his genetic imprint, there is a fair chance that the defective gene will remain inactive since others outside this person’s lineage most probably do not have that defective gene. Now if after 5-10 generations down the line say one of his descendants marries some other descendant who may be really far away cousins. But then there is a possibility that both of them are still carrying the defective gene, and in that case their children will definitely have the defective gene express itself and cause the genetic abnormality in them as both the Chromosomes in the pair have the defective genes. Hence, the marriages between cousins always have a chance of causing an otherwise recessive, defective genes to express themselves resulting in children with genetic abnormalities.
So if the Vedic Rishis had allowed marriages within the same Gotras, then there were chances that the resulting male can be a victim of such defective gene expression, and any such gene expressions which took place in the 5% exposed area of the Y Chromosome would be fatal for the continuity of that Y Chromosome. Even after hundreds of generations there would still be chances of any defective genes being propagated within these successive generations, and marriage within the same Gotra would provide a golden opportunity for these genes to express themselves, there by causing the genetic abnormality in the offspring.
And hence the ancient Vedic Rishis created the Gotra system where they barred marriage between a boy and a girl belonging to the same Gotra no matter how deep the lineage tree was, in a bid to prevent inbreeding and completely eliminate all recessive defective genes from the human DNA.

Why only the selected list of Rishis as root Gotras? Why not somebody else?

When we look at the list of the Gotrakarni Rishis (ie the root Gotras), you may note that almost all of these Rishis are also Prajapatis – Prajapatis are those who were the immediate descendants of Brahma (the Creator God) – who then went on to create their own progeny or lineage.
So having the Gotra system start from the very beginning of human lineage looks more apt and logical as this is where the chromosomes and genes are still pure and free of any possible genetic defects. Hence the Prajapatis were selected as the root of the Gotra System.
Note that genetic defects or disorders or bad genes get eventually picked up over time during evolution due to genetic mutations.






GOD


The trinity of Vedic Gods

G enerator – Brahma 
O bserver – Vishnu 
D estroyer – Shiva




Rigveda answers about speed of light.


तरणिर्विश्वदर्शतो जयोतिष्क्र्दसि सूर्य |
विश्वमा भासिरोचनम |
taraNir vishvadarshato jyotishkrdasi surya |
vishvamaa bhaasirochanam ||
which means
“Swift and all beautiful art thou, O Surya (Surya=Sun), maker of the light,
Illuming all the radiant realm.”
Above is fourth verse of the Rigvedic hymn 1:50 (50th hymn in book 1 of rigveda) 
Commenting on this verse in his Rigvedic commentary, Sayana who was a minister in the court of Bukka of the great Vijayanagar Empire of Karnataka in South India (in early 14th century) says:
tatha ca smaryate yojananam. sahasre dve dve sate dve ca yojane
ekena nimishardhena kramaman.
which means “It is remembered here that Sun (light) traverses 2,202 yojanas in half a nimisha”
NOTE: Nimisharda= half of a nimisha
In the vedas Yojana is a unit of distance and Nimisha is a unit of time.
Mathematical calculations of a research done by (S S De and P V Vartak on the speed of light) calculated using the Rigvedic hymns and commentaries on them. they say:

Imagine that archaeologists, digging a thousand year old virgin site in Antarctica, come across an inscription deep underground that shows the sun, and next to it the numbers 186,000 miles per second, the speed of light. What would the world do? More likely than not, this find will not be accepted by scholars. A fraud, they would say, committed for cheap fame. The reputation of the archaeologists will be ruined. If they didn't hold tenure, they will lose their jobs.
Only lunatics will support them, claiming that this proves that aliens have visited the earth from time to time. The high priests of the academy will say that even if the find was genuine it proves nothing; at best it is a coincidence.
But what an astonishing coincidence! Just the right number out of an infinite different numbers!
The speed of light was first determined in 1675 by Roemer who looked at the difference in the times that light from Io, one of the moons ofJupiter, takes to reach earth based on whether it is on the near side of Jupiter or the far side. Until then light was taken to travel with infinite velocity. Even Newton assumed so.
But why are we talking about the absurd scenario of the archaeologists in Antarctica? Because, we are confronted with a situation that is quite similar!
I am an archaeologist of texts. I read old texts from the point of view of history of science. One such book is the celebrated commentary on the Rigveda by Sayana (c. 1315-1387), a minister in the court of King Bukka I of the Vijayanagar Empire in South India.
In a hymn addressed to the sun, he says that it is "remembered that the sun traverses 2,202 yojanas in half a nimesha.''
This statement could either relate to the speed of the sun or to that of light. The units are well known. For example, the Indian epic "Mahabharata", conservatively dated to 400 BC - 400 AD, defines 1 nimesha to be equal to 16/75.3 seconds; 1 yojana is about 9 miles. Substituting in Sayana's statement we get 186,536 miles per second.
Unbelievable, you'd say! It cannot be the speed of light. Maybe it refers to the speed of the sun in its supposed orbit around the earth. But that places the orbit of the sun at a distance of over 2,550 million miles. The correct value is only 93 million miles and until the time of Roemer the distance to the sun used to be taken to be less than 4 million miles. This interpretation takes us nowhere.
What about the possibility of fraud? Sayana's statement was printed in1890 in the famous edition of Rigveda edited by Max Muller, the German Sanskritist. He claimed to have used several three or four hundred year old manuscripts of Sayana's commentary, written much before the time of Roemer.
Is it possible that Muller was duped by an Indian correspondent who slipped in the line about the speed? Unlikely, because Sayana's commentary is so well known that an interpolation would have been long discovered. And soon after Muller's "Rigveda'' was published, someone would have claimed that it contained this particular "secret'' knowledge. The fact that the speed in the text corresponds to the speed of light was pointed out only recently by S.S. De and P.V. Vartak. Also a copy of Sayana's manuscript, dated 1395 AD, is available.
Further support for the genuineness of the figure in the ancient book comes from another old book, the Vayu Purana. This is one of the earliest Puranas, considered to be at least 1,500 years old. (The same reference is to be found in the other Puranas as well.)
In Chapter 50 of this book, there is the statement that the sun moves 3.15 million yojanas in 48 minutes. This corresponds to about 10,000 miles per second if considered as speed of light, and 135 million miles for the distance to the sun, if considered as the speed of the sun. Sayana's speed of light is exactly 18 times greater than this speed of the sun! Mere numerology?
We must also not forget that the Puranas speak of the creation and destruction of the universe in cycles of 8.64 billion years, that is quite close to currently accepted value regarding the time of the big bang.
For the rationalists these numbers are a coincidence. Given the significance of these numbers, they'd look very carefully at the old manuscripts of Sayana's commentary.
There are others who would say that consciousness, acting on itself can find universal knowledge. Look, they'd say, by examining biological cycles one can know the periods of the sun and the moon. So why shouldn't it be possible to know other universal truths?
They'd add that ancient texts speak - and this is true - of embryo transplants, multiple births from the same fetus, air and space travel, slowing or speeding of time, weapons that can destroy the entire world. They'd say that it is more than ancient science fiction, it shows that the human imagination can envision all that can happen.
This brings us back to the question of whether the figure of 186,000 miles per second in Sayana's book is a astonishing coincidence, an example of the powers of intuition, or a meaningless number.
What do you think?






Amazing Sanskrit...


‘yamātārājabhānasalagam’
Pronounced as yamaataaraajabhaanasalagam and written in sanskrit as यमाताराजभानसलगं
This is a word used extensively throughout the ancient Sanskrit grammar works. The greatness of this word lies in the fact that
  • This is the world’s oldest Combinatoric formula
  • This is the world’s oldest known de Bruijn Sequence
  • This is the world’s oldest known ‘Shift Register’
  • This is one of the world’s oldest known memory wheel or mnemonic (because there are many other such memory wheels in ancient vedas)
First, let us see what this Sanskrit word represents. It represents a binary sequence as follows:
Consider the word ‘Canada’. This can be split into Ca-na-da where all three syllables require the same amount of time to pronounce.
Now consider the word ‘America’. This can be split into A-me-ri-ca where A-ri-ca require the same amount of time to pronounce where as ‘me’ in America requires twice the amount of time as ‘A’ or ‘ri’ or ‘ca’ to pronounce.
So in Sanskrit grammar we have short syllables (called Laghu) and long syllables (called Guru). Examples of laghu above are Ca,Na,Da in Canada and A,ri,ca in America. Example of Guru is the long syllable Me in America.
Short syllables are denoted by 1 and long syllables by 0. So we can write the syllables of the above mentioned sanskrit word ‘yamātārājabhānasalagam’ as 1000101110
Now let us see how this is a Combinatoric. Combinatorics is all about combinations. An example is, given 9 unique symbols, in how many unique ways can we pick a group of 3 symbols from it?
A second category of problems is a more tougher version of the above problem, given 3 unique symbols in how many unique ways can we pick a group of 9 symbols from it, by allowing repeated pick of a given symbol?
‘yamātārājabhānasalagam’ as a combinatoric represents a solution to one such problem of the second type where we have two symbols 0 and 1 and we have to find out as to how many unique groups of three can we pick up from it by allowing repeated picks?
The simple answer to the problem here is just divide the given formula into groups of three by shifting one place at a time as follows:
1000101110 = 100,000,001,010,101,011,111,110
Now this represents all the 8 possible combinations for the above mentioned problem of arranging 0 and 1 into groups of three! In other words, this is the list of all possible triplets of a binary sequence!
A Shift Register too!
Since the solution is in the form of shifting one place at a time from the left, this is also the world’s first ‘shift register’! Note that shift registers are used extensively in modern computers to speed up calculations. Software programmers friends like Jasdev, Saugata etc. might be aware of left shifts and right shifts << and >>
Mnemonic
The main purpose of this word is to use it as a mnemonic or a memory wheel. That would make it easy for one to remember and quickly recall all possible combinations. There are hundreds of such words that are used in Sanskrit as mnemonics to help people memorize mathematical numbers and formulae. The authors of these mnemonics have been so creative that they have created sacred hymns, short stories etc which initially look like genuine hymns or short stories or sentences or proverbs or riddles etc, but when you decrypt them into numbers you end up with a hashing algorithm, or the value of PI to infinite decimal places, or with a logarithm etc, or with a formula etc…
The first memory wheel in modern history of mathematics appears only in 1882 where one such memory wheel was created by the French Mathematician Emile Baudot!! Can you imagine how advanced ancient Indian grammar and mathematics was!! Sometimes I feel we are actually living in a technologically inferior era compared to ancient Indians where today we are just reinventing the wheel !!
De Bruijn Sequence
These are special types of sequences first studied in modern history by de Bruijn and are defined as ‘Given a set S of words of length n, a de Bruijn sequence of span n is a periodic sequence such that every word in S (and no other n-tuple) occurs exactly once.’ In simple terms, de Bruijn sequences are nothing but the shift registers mentioned above!
Where is ‘yamātārājabhānasalagam’ used?
In Sanskrit grammar this is used to divide poetry into a collection of three syllables called Gaṇas. ‘Yamātārājabhānasalagam’ defines all the 8 possible Ganas as follows
  • ‘Ya’ Gana is 100
  • ‘Ma’ Gana is 000
  • ‘Ta’ Gana is 001
  • ‘Ra’ Gana is 010
  • ‘Ja’ Gana is 101
  • ‘Ba’ Gana is 011
  • ‘Na’ Gana is 111
  • ‘Sa’ Gana is 110
The gana combinations are then used to define the rules for writing poetry. It is rules like these that form the basis of the most mathematical and scientific human spoken language – Sanskrit, which is why it was termed to be the only human spoken language with the ability to become a software programming language because of its precision – the research was done by the Forbes Magazine of Germany.
Which is why I have always felt that this language was not born on earth, but instead is of an alien origin, the language spoken by aliens with advanced technology and science. Those aliens were probably Type II or Type III civilizations!! Note that ancient vedic texts call Sanskrit as ‘Deva Bhaasha’ which means ‘A language of Divine (alien?) origin’

yug, mahaayug, manavaantar and kalp..युग, महायुग, मनवान्तर तथा कल्प


कल्प का अर्थ

‘कल्प’ शब्द का प्रयोग ऋग्वेद  में पाया जाता है। जहाँ कहा गया है कि - ‘सृष्टिकर्ता ने सूर्य, चंद्र, दिन, पृथ्वी एवं अंतरिक्ष की, पहले की तरह, सृष्टि की।’ निश्चित तिथि वाला अत्यंत प्राचीन प्रमाण अशोक के अनुशासनों में पाया जाता है, यथा गिरनार एवं कालसी के चौथे लेख तथा शहबाजगढ़ी एवं मानसेहरा के पांचवे लेख से यह सिद्ध होता है कि कल्प के विशाल विस्तार के सिद्धांत  तीसरी शती ई. पू. के बहुत पहले से ज्ञात थे। 
बौद्धों ने भी कल्पों के सिद्धांत को अपनाया था, यह 'महापरिनिब्बानसुत' से स्पष्ट है- ‘हे भगवन्, कृपा करके कल्प में रहें । हे महाभाग, असंख्य लोगों के कल्याण एवं सुख के लिए कल्प भर रहें।’ ऐसी मान्यता है कि आदि काल में मानव-समाज आदर्श रूप से अति उत्कृष्ट था और क्रमश: नैतिक बातों, स्वास्थ्य, जीवन-विस्तार आदि में क्रमिक रूप से अपकर्श (decline) होता चला गया और सुदूर भविष्य में पुन: नैतिक बातों आदि का स्वर्ण युग अवतरित होगा।

सृष्टिक्रम और विकास की गणना के लिए कल्प हिन्दुओं का एक परम प्रसिद्ध मापदंड है। जैसे मानव की साधारण आयु सौ वर्ष है, वैसे ही  सृष्टिकर्ता ब्रह्मा की भी आयु सौ वर्ष मानी गई है, परंतु दोनों गणनाओं में बड़ा अन्तर है। ब्रह्मा का एक दिन 'कल्प' कहलाता है, उसके बाद प्रलय होता है। प्रलय ब्रह्मा की एक रात है जिसके पश्चात्‌ फिर नई सृष्टि होती है।

महायुग
प्रत्येक मनवनतरा 27 महायुग का बना है। हम इस मनवान्तर 27सवें महायुग में हैं। 

वेद का कहना है। एक महायुग 4 युगों का एक संग्रह है। महा विशाल या बड़ा मतलब है।
4 युगों सत्य युग, त्रेता युग, द्वापर युग, कलयुग हैं। हम हमारे वर्तमान महायुग के कलियुग में हैं।

युग  
सत्य युग एक महायुग के 40% समय के लिए रहता है - इस समय मनुष्य परमात्मा के चरणों में रहता है। जहां मानव का भौतिक अस्तित्व का इतना मतलब है की "जरूरत है" और वह परमेश्वर के साथ सीधे संपर्क में हैं

त्रेता युग महायुग के 30% के लिए रहता है - यहां बुरे कर्मों के दिखने की शुरूआत होती है, परन्तु अभी भी वहाँ सत्य की बहुतायत होती है, वास्तव में इस उम्र के 3/4 भाग अभी भी अच्छाई है।

द्वापर युग अपने युग के तीसरे चरण मे आता है, तथा पूरे महायुग के 20 प्रतिशत इसका दूसरा मतलब है, जहां अच्छे और बुरे कर्म लगभग बराबर राशि के होते हैं 

कलयुग या काली युग (यहां काली का मतलब काली देवी नही काली रात से है) एक महायुग के 10% का समय अथवा 25% अच्छाई का युग होता है। सही भी है, आज के समय को देखते हुए सच भी है।

मनवान्तर
चार महायुगों का सम्मिलन एक मनवान्तर होता है और ऐसे 27 मनवान्तर का एक कल्प कहा जाता है। और ऐसे एक कल्प का ब्रह्मा का एक दिन और दूसरे कल्प की रात होती है।  

इतना ही ब्रह्मा का जीवन है, इसके पश्चात नये ब्रह्मा का सर्जन होगा, तथा रामचरितमानस मे कहा गया है कि अगले ब्रह्मा हनुमान होंगे। 



युगों की अवधि इस प्रकार है -
सत्युग 17,28,000 वर्ष
त्रेता 12,96,000 वर्ष
द्वापर 8,64,000 वर्ष 
और कलियुग 4,32,000 वर्ष। 

वेदों मे कहा गया है कि प्रत्येक महायुग कि समाप्ति तथा दूसरे महायुग के प्रारम्भ होने के बीच भी एक युग होता है जिसमें सब शून्य होता है।  

गिनियस बुक आफ़ वर्ल्ड रिकार्ड्स ने कल्प को समय का सर्वाधिक लम्बा मापन घोषित किया है।


Significance of Tulsi (तुलसी) (Basil)


Most of the times science contradicts religious beliefs but it is not the case when it comes to tulsi, a holy plant with great therapeutic powers. No other plant on the planet earth commands that reverence. This plant has put in high esteem in Hindu mythology as it is considered as Goddess Lakshmi a concert of lord Vishnu. The plant is one of the prime ingredients of most of the ceremonies performed by Hindus. In addition, it offers excellent remedies to a number of diseases. Owing to its various medicinal uses, this plant is called queen of the herbs. 

When it comes to the geographical distribution, the plant is commonly found in tropical and warmer regions. India, being home of this plant has developed a number of medicines from this plant to treat a wide array of diseases.  There are many medical significance of Tulsi. Even regular intake of tulsi tea is enough to keep one fit. The plant is a very good for the treatment of sore throat. It also offers relief from various respiratory elements like asthma and bronchitis. It also offers relief from cough and cold and mild fever. It has also been found effective in the treatment of malaria. 
"Modern scientific research offers impressive evidence that Tulsi reduces stress, enhances stamina, relieves inflammation, lowers cholesterol, eliminates toxins, protects against radiation, prevents gastric ulcers, lowers fevers, improves digestion and provide rich supply of antioxidants and other nutrients. Tulsi is especially effective in supportive the heart, blood vessels, liver and lungs and also regulates blood pressure and blood sugar."
Srimati Tulasi devi is one of the most exalted devotees of the Sri Krishna. All scriptures stress on the importance of getting the mercy of Tulasi devi if one has to make progress in the path of devotion. In the Skanda Purana it is said: ‘Tulasi is auspicious in all respects. Simply by seeing, simply by touching, simply by remembering, simply by praying to, simply by bowing before, simply by hearing about or simply by sowing this tree, there is always auspiciousness. Anyone who comes in touch with the Tulasi tree in the above-mentioned ways lives eternally in the Vaikuntha world."

Spiritual aspects 

Above this material world is the eternal spiritual world comprised of millions of Vaikuntha planets. The topmost planet in Vaikuntha is Goloka which is presided by Sri Krishna in His original form. Here resides Vrinda devi, an intimate associate of and an expansion of Srimati Radharani. Her partial expansion is Tulasi devi in the Vaikuntha planets and they are all considered non-different from her.


As the embodiment of the lila-sakti (pastime potency), Vrinda devi is the organizer of all the transcendental pastimes between Sri Krishna and Srimati Radharani. In Goloka every thing is animate (cit) and only for the pleasure of Sri Krishna. Vrinda devi makes this happen. She is assisted by many confidential associates (which include two parrots) and with their help she makes sure that every thing is pleasing to Sri Krishna. She controls how the wind blows, when and where it rains, how the trees bend, and so many other things for the pleasure of the Divine Couple.

The scriptures are full of pastimes that reveal the potency of Tulasi in developing devotion for the Lord.
The Srimad Bhagavatam talks about this pastime with the four Kumaras, the sons of Lord Brahma who were very much attached to the impersonal aspect of Godhead.

‘When the breeze carrying the aroma of tulasi leaves and saffron from the lotus feet of the lotus-eyed Personality of Godhead entered through the nostrils into the hearts of those sages [the Kumaras], they experienced a change in both body and mind, even though they were attached to the impersonal Brahman understanding.'

Thus by simply smelling the fragrance of the Tulasi leaves the four Kumaras became pure devotees of the Lord.

In Caitanya lila Srila Advaita Acarya was very much disturbed to see the growth of irreligiosity. Therefore He decided to call for the Personality of Godhead Krishna to descend by worshiping the Lord with tulasi leaves and the water of the Ganges. When Sri Krishna was please by this devotion He descended as Caitanya Mahaprabhu.